![ich liebe dich hearts ich liebe du. ich liebe dich hearts](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiZFYu1wKsuKYOa8guxwUlxrQ9i2S-GO5q2vUY2zPaqyyT4uIOa4SomTA2wrN2c0NNgU9L1MtGnfcRn5DATMek8OyTq3hdrYSH8qaCC2BcbTpsQlTVVqhaQ_Jt49LYYxkOf1SUABNsI8Dc/s1600/3490481_8e0c045b9c_m.jpg)
Nope, it doesn't. Besides, I already told you in another thread that Intel agrees with my intrepetation on this matter. The see dual-dual systems as 2-way systems, whereas according to you, they are 4-way systems. Are you saying that Intel does not know what they are doing?
Intel and AMD push hard to make sure that a dual-core processor is *licensed* as a single CPU. This is because there are a lot of big software packages that are priced according to the number of processors, often much more expensive for a 4-way than a 2-way.
The CPU makers wouldn't sell as many multi-core chips if the systems were much more expensive (in TCO) than single-core chips. Therefore they pretend that a "processor" is what can be plugged into a socket. The software sees that there are "physical processors" (a package with pins) and "logical processors" (the CPU that we've been familiar with for decades, which requires SMP hardware capabilities to be useful with 2 or more).
They say that software licensing should consider the *physical* processor count for licensing terms. (For example, XP Home will run SMP on a dual-core, but not on a dual-socket. XP Pro will run 4-way SMP on a dual-socket quad-core, but not on a quad-socket quad-core. Microsoft licensing looks at the number of physical processors, while of course the software runs according to the number of logical processors.)
So, Intel/AMD/MS have an agenda that requires them to distort the meaning of the word "processor". They have to warp the word "processor" to justify the licensing stance.
___________________________________
And, if you're so hung up on the hardware distinctions, consider:
![Ich liebe dich, du sanftestes ich liebe du. Ich liebe dich, du sanftestes](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tmv6YcU1RT6OUFB9ngmf3AdPmkobwK5-y4HiZ5xjjWFiIJWOVmVA41_wXSLsF7NZ8PrvGmyXOEDHOLv0dmbvOx1F-0zxRDKt4uVosJKZw-EJ-51Q8QBmHsO2Bdqo9kn5qjh0-VB0ND02R7Vm38hmiVyG8=s0-d)
Ich liebe dich, du sanftestes
![ich liebe du. ich liebe du. ich liebe du.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_tEfBnUzpRueMX6jwlSGTmSIL-1YzUeIx7E_jfNDTehvcBiqlpIzNc2e_RTOitPz8LTJjZR3rWPcJLDBpEUKYBqUSvgVYLfZbj8tBUDAa1NsFs_3Ir6NuY4lFaphzatzwCVUYqeohuV6fdBfbY92Rot4J9hKhyLqa6p9VRRiM_xiQ=s0-d)
ich liebe du.
![Ich+Ich:Du Erinnerst Mich An ich liebe du. Ich+Ich:Du Erinnerst Mich An](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uNC_HgiAXhYgMjoY6Psgh3m20KcHf5qTjVgAOPfumxb1KUqsGDDoPN-Jc6k-i8vaUN3sYDdvId0DxDQR0Ulkok-c8DauQvGvjtwErry5H1WjXhqo3_DmrXqGFyljK2raFvdMCzAsIUYQjKgmsD7zRELe2P_Y_ZOoeMJ0kGBQ=s0-d)
Ich+Ich:Du Erinnerst Mich An
![ich liebe du ich liebe du. ich liebe du](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_t_VFfO-cuhEfuPXzlYir67_oFFacEe6gRz-oX2Krnj_l6QzgOm3vIeb_uPgeiCbxQf4kRE2kkzapjLF4R9L72uEicRWyrTFeUkl3RKE00ksaA5n07csVNqcscmJp5UiXNTu2pqWmU7HcK0KRz3jWv7tzc=s0-d)
ich liebe du
![ich liebe du. ich liebe du. ich liebe du.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_vxsLQXQLvNpnxqKQNMuLYyRf5T7rwfnY6hkw-t_LSr4FLMbajabbyG17QSvRIvUp0-w1e57wEWy6ioT8uzUNOkNTwE_FIXmBzmzUWufK1TS_u_3SHCnKE_q8tNwdMt72Zm35Q-Bd_cI_J8nucX5vdZxivU8SLQIpIRw335t90EQPb3IsY=s0-d)
ich liebe du.
![ich liebe du ich liebe du. ich liebe du](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_v4dITQinUBF77RXXHLoFl1UyiI3j7n2SEUCT24_EcK8ixcRMjquEjyqmeiv9oU92nJMdETJNBa8Q5nb5InUjZ7NtADnub-ruy_kCFz7VaEjaYq6dIDsZb_CTE2viAiUvWPRaDOshM=s0-d)
ich liebe du
![ich liebe du. ich liebe du. ich liebe du.](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_uL15TFcf7kDAfkzhBAkBcZHmLnNOQ8gaxWTvmRi-HMG6cDCAc13pSUEmLpIrf2njeri8rJZkBWTQZ1VgjebUrCRthlPohrSoGb9yndX8nsEv-X_oRqRXhUxgcp8WXoqHpJAUcUD2xYHzBnBnkIsIguOP4MxoBWfvfekA=s0-d)
ich liebe du.
![Du amp; Ich 4-eva x3 stefan ich ich liebe du. Du amp; Ich 4-eva x3 stefan ich](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_t_9vkO-JDUvFLrsuFkCTEIRtAlF4vpRgOyjCd81uFpWKRNEza0OcY6-CD2kuEvVQvKKOTyh4l1u7LRLLKfp65lf2O20eRggmBl0dAem-ATbSnjVRWSmUUisj5rQkzu7JnsWo6gUlQkjE_CU-sESpWaHX24_I8V6PACqK0KfhxztoOEf3iJ=s0-d)
Du amp; Ich 4-eva x3 stefan ich
![Search: Liebe ich liebe du. Search: Liebe](https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/blogger_img_proxy/AEn0k_sZTpt-T8FTVVNA9GijHskkOOLEzgY2y1jG2ZqWzJrYlFy7EEfAZ_Cg74xEv51Ucg5E9qEQ4K0sEj5n8USw-T0SLOaqP8HxsIGIv3eZGdU-pUpr-4H3Lip6LMamfrFNn1UOTw2Act1BqdHGssChIKXGzq2LnqhsrLi4rPdFEsCCRro5u3YJcunid4-T-XR1FqJYnx2B6xaoS1BtLvoNVDUjrIl4gZYAOXOZTQ=s0-d)
Search: Liebe
Intel and AMD push hard to make sure that a dual-core processor is *licensed* as a single CPU. This is because there are a lot of big software packages that are priced according to the number of processors, often much more expensive for a 4-way than a 2-way.
The CPU makers wouldn't sell as many multi-core chips if the systems were much more expensive (in TCO) than single-core chips. Therefore they pretend that a "processor" is what can be plugged into a socket. The software sees that there are "physical processors" (a package with pins) and "logical processors" (the CPU that we've been familiar with for decades, which requires SMP hardware capabilities to be useful with 2 or more).
They say that software licensing should consider the *physical* processor count for licensing terms. (For example, XP Home will run SMP on a dual-core, but not on a dual-socket. XP Pro will run 4-way SMP on a dual-socket quad-core, but not on a quad-socket quad-core. Microsoft licensing looks at the number of physical processors, while of course the software runs according to the number of logical processors.)
So, Intel/AMD/MS have an agenda that requires them to distort the meaning of the word "processor". They have to warp the word "processor" to justify the licensing stance.
___________________________________
And, if you're so hung up on the hardware distinctions, consider:
As cool as that poster might be, I doubt that he has the political or monetary muscle that the Catholic Church does.
That doesn't take away from how utterly hypocritical that train of thought is.
That doesn't take away from how utterly hypocritical that train of thought is.